Sunday, January 31, 2010

Movie Review - The English Patient

Gibran’s passionate says “Beauty is a thing of might and dread. Like the tempest she shakes the earth beneath us and sky above us”. For Socrates “Beauty is on a par with Goodness and Truth in the trinity of perfect Ideas.” Love is yearning for this beauty; it is the poet’s elation, the artist’s revelation, the musician’s inspiration. Anthony Minghella’s epic The English Patient explores love like no other modern day movie has, heart burning with raw passion, mind befuddled about right and wrong. The moral boundaries get blurred; love sometimes is incompatible with morality. The English Patient is no Romeo-Juliet tale; the forbidden fruit status of Katherine Clifton lends the classical tragedy touch to the movie. Michael Ondaatje’s captivating novel had won the Booker prize in 1992. Minghella brings all the lyrical prose into the screen, keeping the audience enthralled in his 160 minute long love saga.
The movie starts in 1943; a British plane flying over the Sahara is brought down by German anti-aircraft machineries. The pilot is rescued by Bedouins, his “organs are packing up.”; he is “a bit of toast”. Horribly burnt and amnesiac from the accident, the patient is passed over to the Allied authorities; the English patient had arrived. The patient is taken care off by a Canadian nurse Hana (Juliette Binoche). Hana persuades her seniors to let her stay with the patient is a deserted villa. The young Hana’s loving affection helps the patient to recall events from his past; drifting sporadically between his memories of the desert. He was a desert-based archaeologist, a Hungarian, Count Laszlo Almasy, whose reticence doesn’t give an insight to the passion burning in the man. When a fellow adventurer of the Royal Geographic society, Geoffrey Clifton arrives in the desert one day with his beautiful wife Katherine, Almasy is not exactly elated. Katherine greets him “I wanted to meet the man who could write such a long paper with so few adjectives”. Almasy brushes her off “A thing is a thing, no matter what you put in front of it; small car, broken car, still a car”.
In the Italian villa where they had put up, Hana tries to recover from the recent death of her boyfriend. Dosed up by morphine the Count goes on ruminating memories from the past. The seemingly taciturn Hungarian is swept by a fervor; call it love or infatuation; for Katherine. “The heart is an organ of fire”, the Count writes later. Soon the duo is dancing together, much to the ire of Geoffrey.
In the villa, passers by drop every other day. One of them is Kip, a Sikh who is serving in the British army. The young Hana develops tenderness to this soldier and their love accentuates between the long flashbacks of the Count’s love tale. Another visitor is David Caravaggio, a thief who worked for the Italian resistance during the war. Caravaggio seems to know more about the patient than anyone else. Hana is content with her patient sailing in the seas of his remembrance; Caravaggio seems like a man on a mission to dig out some unhappy truths about the count.
The English Patient is a soul-stirring tragedy that goes directly for your tear ducts. Ondaatje’s novel itself is a piece of classic fiction and the lyricism is expressively translated into the screen. The most striking aspect is the photography; never has the desert looked so beautiful after Lawrence of Arabia. But John Seale’s Sahara is much more feminine, its beauty doesn’t burn, rather it soothes. With such a magnificent backdrop, the camera just gently caresses the actors, capturing their mood through their eyes. The background score by Gabriel Yared is a winner all the way; alternating between the melancholic and the ecstatic embodying the pain and bliss that every heart in the movie harbours.
The acting is Oscar caliber and uniformly high. Few actors today can match Fiennes’ intensity. He is reticent; Katherine complains “You speak so many bloody languages, and you never want to talk”. The hallmark of great actors is that they can talk through eyes. Brando’s brittle sad face turned American cinema upside down, Pacino’s eyes were enough to convey his Corleonesque charm. Fiennes rarely talks as Almasy “I am a bit rusty at social graces”; yet you can feel his sweltering desire for Katherine. Kristin Scott Thomas is sensual and intelligent, carefully nuancing her way from eroticism to intellect. Juliette Binoche is cute as the nurse Hana, but her role is not fully realized by the script.
The English Patient evokes one word: passion. Morally, its not pristine love. The movie portrays passion in all its terrifying reality. When you sit down to analyze whether their love was wrong and hence reprehensible, you get a gentle yes from within. When you ask yourself whether their love was sublime, the consent gets stronger. “Beyond happiness and unhappiness, though it is both things, love is intensity”, wrote Paz. The lovers in the movie had gone mad in their adulterous affair, yet they were courageous enough to defy society. In one of the scenes, Katherine slaps Laszlo hard, and then takes him into her arms; she does not want to taste the forbidden pleasure but in the depth of her heart she is unwilling to resist it.
The English Patient is moving experience that carries us across the expanses of the Sahara to the serene Italian countryside, from the dark alleys of man’s desire to the radiant realm of love. Dying on his bed, the Count remembers his beautiful Katherine. “Sail your smile into the air; it will reach and enliven me! Breathe your fragrance into the air; it will sustain me”. You have got to see it to feel the yearning for love. It rates as the best love saga after Casablanca.

Movie Review - The Last Emperor

Bernardo Bertolucci’s The Last Emperor is a sweeping epic rendered in the grandest scale. This lavish film portrays the life and times of the last monarch of China, Henri Pu Yi, who ascended the throne as an infant at the age of three in 1908; and died a common man in 1970. The movie uses the life of Pu Yi to reveal a fascinating phase in Chinese history; the transition from feudalism to the revolution that it engendered and paved the way for modern day Communism.
Pu Yi ascended the throne at the age of three, growing up under the argus-eyed eunuch servants until he abdicated at the age of seven. Still Pu Yi remained as the nominal figurehead living a life of opulence for the convenience of the invisible powers that be. Under the watchful eyes of a Scottish tutor, Reginald Johnston, Pu Yi learns the ways of the western world, gets married and takes a concubine. In 1924, the emperor is exiled to Manchuria by the Nationalists; here the Japanese take control over him. Knowing fully well the ecstasy of freedom, yet having never tasted it, Pu Yi’s frustrations get the better of him as he turns into a decadent playboy. With the World War II taking center stage in world affairs Pu Yi is relegated to a mere puppet, always at the beck and call of the Japanese. With the WWII coming to an end, he is captured by the Russians who in turn hand him to their new allies, the Communists.
Pu Yi seems destined for an execution, a fate that he had resigned himself to, yet his new “masters” “re-educate” him in the Communist ways. Pu Yi lived the last 10 years of his life as a gardener in Peking until he died in 1967.
The movie seamlessly continues Hollywood’s penchant for grand offerings; Gone with the Wind to Ben Hur to Cleopatra to Lawrence of Arabia to The English Patient to Titanic. It’s a biopic with a difference. As in Gandhi or Lawrence of Arabia, far-reaching historical changes rang during the lives of the protagonists; the men in question were instrumental channeling those winds of change. Unlike them, Pu Yi had no control over the state of affairs. This is an epic, a different one; it is passive in its rendition. Pu Yi was born to riches but no freedom, his world of paradoxes never allowed him any power, he was a monarch but could not ever assert his authority.
The Last Emperor set a record of sorts; it won each of the nine Oscars it was nominated for, including Best Picture and Best Director. While it deserved in all aspects, John Lone playing Pu Yi missing out to Michael Douglas (Wall Street) for the Best Actor was an unfortunate one. Lone does exceptionally well to portray the passivity of the character, the helplessness, the decadence and the aging; particularly in that order. Peter O’Toole brings all his charm into Reginald Johnston.
The Chinese government granted exclusive authority to Bertolucci to shoot the film in the Forbidden City, thus giving him the opportunity to be the first Westerner to get inside the Forbidden City. Colours are brilliantly blended into the entire length; the esoteric walls of the Forbidden City are as much characters as the humans they contain. Bertolucci shot the movie in the most exotic manner possible, making it a visual treat. But it never fails to touch the heart. The movie ends with an extraordinary sequence, in which Pu Yi visits his old abode, the Forbidden City. Years ago, on the day of his coronation, the infant king had received a gift from a soldier; a grasshopper flaunting all its verdant beauty. The infant king had hidden it under his Dragon Throne. Pu Yi, now a commoner, finds the box containing the grasshopper, now old yet somehow managing to mock time. Yes, time is the real protagonist in this grand saga of the last emperor of China. And that makes the movie a venerable one. The exotica of locales, the vibrancy of colors combined with the Bertolucci’s wide-ranging vision of the times makes The Last Emperor an unforgettable experience.
.

Phir Mile Sur



One of the most enduring memories of the late 80s television was the national integration video, Mile Sur Mera Tumhara. Launched on the republic day of 1988, the 5 minute song was homage to the idea of "unity in diversity". Needless to say, the hummable tune and the plethora of stars made the video an instant craze and till date it remains an icon.
Circa 2010 - The Times Group re-launched a new version naming it "Phir Mile Sur". The new version is more than 15 minutes long, has the entire Bollywood fraternity lining up and depicts “youngistan” in its colorful persona. But did it fail to strike a chord?
I watched the video courtesy YouTube and here's my reaction. Excruciatingly bad, it brings a sense of abomination. I am tired of watching the buy one, get two free package (read the Bachchans). And it is really very difficult to comprehend how Deepika Padukone's leggy avatar contributes to national integration. Aamir Khan, personal favourite that he is, seems to be selling TZP DVDs, the less said of Shahid and Ranbir Kapoor, the better. And above all, the patron saint of all mannerisms, the guiding angel of all the love that is in the air, arms stretched out, lips quivering - does he even need a name? Heads will burst; if this is "youngistan" or whatever such balderdash means, I would be happy dwelling in my glorious stone age with the old world charm of the original Mile Sur; a Amitabh Bachchan than a grumpier version out to prove his greatness, a thoughtful Kamalhasan than a Surya, a heady cocktail of Bengali illuminati than that I-smile-like-a-sheep Shaan - the older version does what it was originally intended to do - evoke emotion.
While I agree that some parts of the video have good intent but overall the video fails to connect. E.g., Amitabh in the opening sequence. The great actor that he is, he makes me feel tired these days. And in the song, he has such a prolonged presence, what more does he need to prove, what is there to prove apart from the fact that his son is a failed dumpster-of- an-actor, his daughter-in-law has been miserable in those crass crossovers and his family owns up all the juries in those ludicrous film awards. The idea is to focus on the theme, not the actor because the theme is much greater than Big/Small/Lady B.
The video had some glaring omissions too. My list of the celebrities who missed out:
· Hrithik Roshan and by extension the Khan and Roshan families and if you can stretch your imagination a little bit more, Barbara Mori and her entire Mexican nation. I mean it makes a better business sense to go for the Khan-Roshan combo than the buy one get two free logic (the Bachchans).
· Add a dollop of Jeetendra and you will have Ekta and her extended Balaji family. Her brother will be a bonus and Salman can play deaf and dumb with him. Two idiots, anyone?
· Why leave Dharmendra aside? He missed out on last term and it wouldn't be bad to see Sunny, Bobby, Esha, Ahana, Hema, Anil Sharma, Tara Singh etc. We could even include scenes of an Indo-Pak war.
· There was no Hurricane Katrina. She is ubiquitous these days and could have made a better Liril girl than Deepika. And with Katrina can come Singh is King, Twinkle Twinkle Little Star, Rajesh Khanna, Pushpa I hate tears, Nawab Pataudi, blackbucks, Saifina, Randhir Kapoor, Neetu Singh, Chintuji, I can't go on more - a melee of the biggest stars on this planet.
Overall rating - Disgusting, a sheer waste of time